The Importance of Board Minutes

Board Meeting Minutes
Are you on a corporate board?  How good is your board when it comes to documenting things like board meeting minutes?

We’re excited to share this excellent article on The Importance of Board Minutes, courtesy of Kevin LaCroix. Kevin is an attorney and Executive Vice President, RT ProExec, a division of RT Specialty. He has over 35 years of experience with director’s and officer’s liability insurance, is a previous faculty member at the Stanford Law School Directors’ College, and is a frequent and influential public speaker. This article was originally published on the D&O Diary website here.

Thank you, Kevin LaCroix, for allowing us to share this with our readers!

1. Impact on the Books and Records Request Process:

The quality of formal board documents such as board minutes and advisor presentations significantly affects how the books and records request process unfolds. If the board records document why the board acted as it did, “the courts have generally refused to allow books and record petitioners access to informal information like texts and emails.” However, where decisions are not documented to the minutes or other records, and appear to have been made through informal communications, “the courts have required production of wide-ranging discovery like texts and emails” that may enable the petitioner to consider filing a complaint for breach of fiduciary duty.

2. Impact on Dismissal Motions in Caremark Cases:

On the one hand, when the book and records incorporated in a complaint show that directors attempted to address a compliance risk, and thus refute the inference of a lack of good-faith effort, Caremark complaints are dismissed. On the other hand, if the books and records contain no indication of efforts to address a compliance risk, the absence of evidence of effort contributes to an inference of the absence of good faith effort to fulfill Caremark duties and thus to a dismissal motion denials.

3. Impact on Corporate Litigation Generally:

Where the corporate records were timely prepared, evidence careful deliberations and proper reasons for board action, the courts have given them credence, and they help corporate defendants win motions to dismiss and trial and defeat motions for preliminary injunctions. However, when minutes are prepared and approved in bulk after a transactional or investigative process has concluded, or even worse, after a complaint has been filed on the basis of a preliminary proxy, courts give them little weight as evidence and resolve doubts about them at the pleading stage in favor of the plaintiffs.

Because of the importance of a disciplined corporate minute process, and in order to take advantage of the benefits of documenting corporate conduct and to avoid the downsides of failing to do so, there are best practices companies can follow, as Strine outlines in his article:

  • Have a general protocol for minuting meetings and be thoughtful when deviating from that protocol;
  • Transform the minuting approval process into an active, iterative part of a reasoned, deliberative process;
  • Ideally, minutes for the prior meeting should be approved at the very next meeting;
  • Ideally, key minutes should be approved at meetings, not by written consent;
  • Make sure minutes and advisor presentations cover key evolving issues and tie up loose ends;
  • Use approved minutes to craft important documents, such as preliminary proxies and committee reports, in the most careful, credible manner.

    Best practices for Board meeting minutes
    Best practices for Board Meeting minutes

Strine also emphasizes the importance for corporate board to “realize the connection between quality documentation practices, integrity in decision-making, and the judicial perception of both corporate fiduciaries and corporate lawyers.”

While the main thrust of Strine’s article is that a disciplined process for the creation and approval of board minutes results in “lower, regulatory and reputational risk,” he notes a further benefit from having disciplined process for documenting the basis of corporate action; that is “it will also lead to better business decisions, more ethical behavior, and a stronger company.”

By crafting and approving minutes and other corporate records as part of an “iterative, active process of thinking in a business-like way about important issues,” the result is “a more lively and active deliberative process …in which it is more likely that all reasonable perspectives will be vetted, and the board’s eventual decision is well-grounded.”

In a perfect world, all companies would incorporate the lessons in Strine’s article into their new board member onboarding process. Well-advised boards will understand and heed his counsel and take his remarks into account when the plan and execute their board processes. I know that in the future I plan on keeping his article at the ready when I am once again preparing to meet with a corporate board.



Republished with permission.

You’ll find many other excellent articles on Kevin LaCroix’s website: The D&O Diary.

Learn more about D&O liability insurance.


Take a course on D&O
Directors and Officers Liability Insurance
2 Hours

Directors & Officers Liability Insurance 101

Take the course! Learn the fundamentals of D&O liability, indemnification, policy structure, claims and more.
Not for profit directors and officers liability insurance course
2 Hours

Not-for-profit Directors and Officers Liability Insurance

Take the course! A valuable resource for every director and officer of a not-for-profit organization and those who support and guide them.